I must admit I don’t think I could have made it up to a top
fifteen – there’s not an embarrassment of riches in the literary rendering of
politics and politicians, unless you’re really keen on varieties of stage
villainy writ large across a page. The challenge, as I see it, is how to render
accurately both the politician’s trade in all its impossible complexity, and
the politician as a realistic human being rather than a straw man
‘leaking sawdust at every pore.’
I don’t believe Penn Warren’s
All The King’s Men can be bettered as a poetic vision of politics, how it works, and what it does to us –
but I do really love Mishima’s
After the Banquet,
inter alia for a special insight
it shares with
Tolstoy’s great novella The False Note, in
which the Tsar, wrestling alone with an ethical problem, is shown to realise
that:
'he could not give himself up to the demands of the human being because of
all the demands that are made on a Tsar from every side; as for admitting that
the demands of the human being might be more binding than the demands made on
him as a Tsar - he did not have the strength to do that.'
This, I think, is one
of the great dilemmas facing the senior politician, whatever his/her
ideological stripe.
My interest in this topic has been sharpened of late since,
as mentioned at the head of the top ten, the novel I’m now working is about a
senior politician of my invention. As is my wont I’ve been researching the world
of the novel as actively as if it were to be a piece of non-fiction, and all of
that legwork has been fascinating. Where I am not bound by the
Chatham House Rule I hope to share a few odds and sods of that research here as I go along.
