In footballing terms, though, there's just one thing I'd want to add to
what's printed in Esquire, related to this notion of a comparison between
supreme athlete and megastar musician that has advanced with the more the
former receives in remuneration and adulation. The performance anxiety of a
footballer ought really to exceed that of any rock star: the crowd is tougher,
plus there’s an opposition whose job is to stop you playing. But Best relished
adversity. In the European Cup Final of 1968 against Benfica, he was targeted,
fouled, and repeatedly felled – a lesser man might have been psyched out of the
game. Instead Best scored a crucial goal that put Man United on the way to
their first European trophy. Not just a pretty face, to put it mildly.
Friday, 10 June 2016
Esquire (July 2016) now on stands: George Best
I haven't written about football at any great length since this, about Zinedine Zidane in 2006, but I'm pleased to report that I have another long piece about another truly great player - George Best - in the new Esquire. The Best essay is rather more concerned with class and culture and money and celebrity in the UK over the last 50 years than it is with what goes on inside the mind of a true master when he's out in the middle of the park - which was and is my interest in the great Zidane. But Best's gifts have been well examined, I have to say, and remain available to the eyes of newcomers on tape. What has happened to the national game in light of socio-economic changes in wider British society still has work to be done on it, in my view, and I will have more to say on that myself in a new book next year.
Ken Adam's Imaginary Architecture
To BFI South Bank last week for a superb tribute to the late
great production designer Ken Adam, he of numerous Bond films, Barry Lyndon, Dr
Strangelove, etc. The Broccoli family/EON
Films, I believe, put the whole thing together; Chris Frayling emceed it
fluently, and a very fine array of speakers paid tribute in-between some
well-crafted clip montages.
Adam had quite some twentieth-century life experience before
cinema. A German Jew who fled Berlin perforce in the 1930s, he served with
valour in the RAF (the story is here), and one of the most memorable tributes on
the night came from a current senior officer in 609 Squadron.
Among a few paeans delivered on film – Roger Moore was dryly
funny, I must say – the most thought-provoking was perhaps from Lord Foster,
who sounded truly enthused about the notion of an alternative history of
architecture, based on the influence of buildings that were never actually
built – or, rather, fabricated only temporarily, on a sound stage, as
imaginative space for scrutiny by a camera lens. Any film-goer can name a
favourite edifice in this regard, a space they would love to have inhabited or
visited, except that it lives only in cinema. (Apparently Adam’s widow Laetitia
would get quite emotional come the day of shooting day on any given Bond
picture when an action sequence called for some glorious set of her husband’s to
be blown to bits.)
I explored my own passion for production design in my long biographical study of Ferdinando Scarfiotti, and pictures that he designed as
diverse as The Conformist and Scarface still work that sort of wish-you-were-there
enchantment on viewers.
Alan Bennett, who became friends with Adam in the filming of
his Madness of King George, attended the tribute in person and spoke intriguingly
of a unique feeling he’d had and professed to not quite understand – namely that
knowing Adam had made him feel part of a ‘European culture’. I briefly thought
this might herald some reference to the EU referendum, but Bennett left the sentiment
there, and it resonated. When the lights came out and I wandered out with the
filmmaker friend who’d invited me long, we shared a few wistful thoughts of the
‘they don’t make them like they used to’ variety, related both to movies and to
people. There’s an obvious aesthetic to the old movie world of built sets and spaces
dressed for celluloid, one that gains lustre as more and more films are very
evidently made by computers. And there’s no point being overly nostalgic for the
sorts of costs that the old studio-style model necessitated.
But cinema is the supreme time-based art form, and so many
pleasures, even of a melancholy variety, derive from that very truth.
A still-neglected piece of Adam finery (fine work, indeed,
from the whole cast and crew) is Pennies From Heaven (1981). This is the
sort of thing I’m talking about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)